Letter to the Editor — Response apropos «Scoping Review on Rehabilitation Scoping Reviews»
- Authors: Heather L Colquhoun, Tiago Silva Jesus, Kelly K O’Brien, Andrea C Tricco, Adora Chui, Wasifa Zarin, Erin Lillie, Sander L Hitzig, Samantha Seaton, Lisa Engel, Shlomit Rotenberg, Sharon E Straus
- Publication Year: 2021
- Journal: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 102(2), pp 340-342
- Link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.10.121
LETTER TO THE EDITOR Apropos «Scoping Review on Rehabilitation Scoping Reviews» Dr Dijkers raised some important perspectives. Evaluating methodological quality of primary studies in scoping reviews is an ideal issue for further debate and additional guidance. Although the rationale for assessing methodological quality (ie, risk of bias) in systematic reviews of intervention effectiveness does not […]
Read More